"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." Communist Tyrant Josef Stalin

Contested Conventions? (Editor's note: This prediction turned out to be wrong.)

 February 11, 2000 NA (Network America) e-wire


Contested Conventions? (Editor's note: This prediction turned out to be wrong.)

There has not been a seriously contested or brokered convention in either major Party since 1976. That's when Ronald Reagan almost toppled sitting President Gerald Ford at the Republican Convention. Since then the winner has been known well in advance of every one of the national conventions in both the Democratic and Republican Parties.

I've been trying to figure out how the Ruling Elite is going to keep the "excitement" going for their two tweedle-dumb and tweedle-dumber major party candidates after their primary season basically ends around Super Tuesday and March 7th, 2000.

I'm starting to fear one or even two contested major party conventions. Remember, all primaries from this day forward are being counted by secret software programs (see end of this message for a powerful expert confirmation of this position) that will instruct the computers what to do. Furthermore, those computer programs are produced by just a handful of mega-companies -- which the Colliers, Phil O'Halloran of Relevance magazine, and myself had all concluded independently -- were probably run by "former" CIA operatives under orders from those paying their salary: the Ruling Elite behind the Federal Reserve Board.

It would be child's play to make sure the computers were programmed to insure one or two contested conventions. In this way, the Big Media could keep up the charade of a real hotly contested battle in their major parties - thus providing an excuse to minimize coverage of Pat Buchanan and other third party candidates.

This would be a departure from the last few primary contests in which insurgent candidates (whom the Ruling Elite feared or didn't want for one reason or another) were challenging one of their boys. HOWEVER, in this cycle we have FOUR major party candidates equally acceptable to the Establishment, as the Big Media has emphasized ad nausem for months. Since we don't have any existing alternative to seriously challenge the Big Media in the contest for the American mind (that's what this e-wire is trying to be "the beginning" of - more on this another time), the Ruling Elite may try and employ their old strategy of divert and diffuse through creating and covering a "fight" in the major parties right up till convention time in August, while ignoring and denigrating the sincere third party candidates. If the Big Boys don't use this strategy, I can't see how they're going to keep the Third Parties from surging between March and October.

We are concentrating on the way the Big Media is channeling the American mind, but rest assured we will report any and all vote-counting information on Iowa, NH, and future contests - as soon as we can responsibly do so.

Let's close today with a quote from page 6 of "Votescam: The Stealing of America" by Jim & Ken Collier, which in turn was quoted by them from a group calling itself "Election Watch." It underlines why I fear an engineered "contested" convention spectacle in one or both of the major parties (be sure to read my comment at the end of this quote). From page 6 of "Votescam":

"Dr. Howard Strauss, a Princeton computer sciences professor and a member of a tiny nationwide group of worried citizens who call themselves "Election Watch," says:

"The presidential election of 1992, without too much difficulty and with little chance of the felons getting caught, could be stolen by computers for one candidate or another. The candidate who can win by computer has worked far enough ahead to rig the election by getting his consultants to write the software that runs thousands of vote-counting computers from coast to coast. There are so many computers that use the same software now that a presidential election can be tampered with - in fact, may already be tampered with. Because of the trade secrecy, nobody can be the wiser." End of Quote.

Dr. Howard Strauss, like many in academia, can't quite believe, or doesn't dare say, the real problem with the scenario he describes: it's NOT the individual candidates who "bribe" or "plant" computer programmers with these companies. How dangerous that would be for the candidate! It's the Ruling Elite behind the Federal Reserve Bank, who have the money to ERECT these mega-computer software companies in the first place - that you have to worry about. It's this crowd (follow the money) which illicitly rules our country behind the camouflage of the two major parties and the 5 Big TV networks. It's that simple, at this juncture. ...

Control of the money-issuing power which Congress delegated to the privately held Federal Reserve Bank + Control of the Big Media erected by that same group of financiers (many of the regional independent media bought up by this same crowd over the last two years) + Control of the major Party structures at the national level achieved pervasively after the "reforms" following Watergate + the ability to program the elections by software programs that have been successfully kept from the public = a very formidable Oligarchy.

But that evil Oligarchy can be exposed and overthrown in this election cycle. Let's all get to work. Please forward the emails you feel are worthwhile to your friends, newsgroups, and other lists. Thanks in advance. Stay tuned, and remember the name of computer expert Howard J. Strauss, whom we'll hear from again.


Jim Condit Jr.
Director, Citizens for a Fair Vote Count

Citizens for a Fair Vote Count - Go to: www.votefraud.org
Network America - go to www.networkamerica.org

Read "Best of" Archives on this site or at www.lewisnews.com at "Citizens for a Fair Vote Count" section accessed in left hand column of home page.

To Subscribe to our daily Network America e-wire: networkamerica-subscribe@topica.com

To Unsubscribe to our daily Network America e-wire: networkamerica-unsubscribe@topica.com

RADIO SHOW ON LINE ALL THE TIME. Listen anytime to the 'Votefraud vs Honest Elections' crash course radio show over the internet at www.sightings.com in the archives, April 3rd, 2000 show, Jeff Rense host, Jim Condit Jr. guest. If the transmission breaks, reconnect to sightings.com and manually move the bar to the place in the show where the audio transmission broke

To write us with information or order by educational tapes and materials by mail, write us at Citizens for a Fair Vote Count, PO Box 11339, Cincinnati, Ohio 45211

To contact us, e-mail to: jconditjr@votefraud.org or jconditjr@networkamerica.org

Please forward our messages to friends and opinion molders, and tell them about our websites and daily e-wire communications. This information, especially in election season, offers an opportunity to de-stablize the New World Order Ruling Elite and restore honest elections with citizens checks and balances, true Freedom under God, and true Free Enterprise in America.

Let fellow citizens, opinion molders, pastors, public officials, internet news outlets, and major newsmedia outlets know -- that we will not believe the published results of elections until transparent, verifiable, honest vote counting methods are restored, i.e., paper ballots with citizen checks and balances, with the ballot counting under the control of the neighborhood registered voters in each precinct.

Back to News index of this month