"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." Communist Tyrant Josef Stalin
17, 2000 NA (Network America) e-wire
It Doesn’t Get Any More Blatant Than This
a recent article in the weekly newspaper, The Wanderer, Paul Likoudis wrote an
important article about the challenge being made to Minority Whip Richard
Gephardt by conservative author and businessman, Bill Federer in this year of
2000 in St. Louis, Missouri.
Wanderer is an important independent source for political news not carried in
the controlled press. America’s oldest Catholic newspaper, founded circa 1867
by the Matt family, which still runs the paper – the Wanderer can be found on
the internet at www.thewandererpress.com)
Gephardt, the former Democratic Speaker of the House, and the current Minority
Whip, has evolved into a flipflopping, annoying, dripping with insincerity,
political waste product --- a typical Ruling Elite puppet who probably started
out with high ideals but subsequently sold his body and soul to the modern Money
Changers – whom he pleases at every turn, while totally ignoring his own
blatant is Gephardt’s understanding of who determines his future, that he no
longer lives in Missouri, but lives in a plush estate near Washington D.C. –
and I would speculate that such a plush estate is unattainable on a
Congressman’s salary alone. His Missouri residence? A vacant apartment that
his mother lived in until about a year ago, when she was moved into a nursing
is it true that Gephardt strikes his constituents that much differently than he
does you and I? Hardly. Grotesque as his public persona is, it just doesn’t
matter. He is a valuable asset to the New World Order Ruling Elite, and they are
not about to let him be defeated just because he get less votes than his
makes no secret of the fact that he expects to become the Speaker of the House
again if the Democrats win the majority of seats in the House of Representatives
in the upcoming 2000 elections.
this backdrop, let’s stand aside and let
Likoudis tell the story as found in the July 20, 2000 edition of the
begins quotes from the Likoudis article:
this year, there is a very big if for Gephardt, who’s facing a serious
challenge by St. Louis Catholic (and Wanderer Reader) Bill Federer, a
businessman in his family’s three generation old real estate firm and a
nationally known historian, author, publisher, and speaker.
polls show that if the election were held today, Gephardt would pull 30% of the
vote in this district, one of the most conservative in the country. Federer
would pull 40%, and of the 30% “undecided” nearly 50% are leaning toward
years ago, Gephardt almost lost to Federer, in the fourth most expensive
Congressional race in the country in which he outspent Federer 16 to 1 and ran a
campaign based on “the politics of personal destruction.” Gephardt’s push
polls asked voters if they’d vote
for Federer if he were “wanted by U.S. marshalls”, and his television ads
depicted the historian and author of the best selling (150,000 copies)
‘America’s God & Country Encyclopedia of Quotations’ as “too extreme
for Missouri. . . .
1998 “victory” over Federer was also allegedly rife with the type of voting
irregularities common to banana republics.
election morning 1998,” Federer told The Wanderer in an interview, “the
phones at my headquarters started ringing and people were telling me my name was
not on the ballot in five wards in the city of St. Louis. When I complained to
the county clerk, Gephardt’s people responded by asking that polling stations
around the district be closed. We had to get attorneys to keep the polls open.
noon, by the time returns started coming in, I was ahead of Gephardt 52% to 48%,
but then, the computers went down in the city of St. Louis, and the electricity
went off in the Jefferson County clerk’s office. This was the third time the
electricity went off at that county clerk’s office in a close election,” he
first time was when Gary Gill ran against Gephardt; the second time was when
gambling casinos were on the ballot --- and gambling won. When I was running
against Gephardt, a Republican watcher in the clerk’s office was prohibited
from looking at the computer screens, and when the computers were later
rebooted, every Republican running had lost.” . . .
returned to Washington with 55.8% of the vote, the lowest in his career, in time
to lead Bill Clinton’s fight to remain in the White House.
of quotes from the 7-20-2000 Wanderer article by Paul Likoudis.)
think about this:
1998, Federer is leading in the early vote tabulating on election day His lead
over New World Order darling Gephardt was 52% to 48%. Sooo . . .
computers go down AND the electricity goes out in the Clerk’s office..
the electricity and computers come back on, Gephardt shoots ahead to win with
55% of the vote … and, wonderful to tell, Gephardt “WINS” !!!
have to admit, this one incident is a pretty good story, almost so good that it
would be unbelievable if it hadn’t been witnessed by thousands of people. So
good that you’d be sure I was making it up if it hadn’t been witnessed by
thousands of people. Right?
Maxwell Smart (Agent 86) used to say in the old GET SMART comedy serious,
“Would you believe . . .”
Federer’s comments above, we might proceed to say, a la Maxwell Smart:
“Would you believe that the exact same thing electricity / computer shut down
scenario happened a few elections ago when a GOP challenger named Gary Gill was
running against this New World Order errand boy, Gephardt?”
let’s go further: “Well, how about -- would you believe that it also
happened – in the same city of St. Louis -- in 1996 when a gambling proposal
was losing in the early going? And would you believe that when the electricity
and computers came back on that the gambling proposal had “won”?
to our good friends the Pusateri’s of Dubuque, word has been gotten to Mr.
Federer’s brother, who is an attorney in St. Louis. He has ordered the
votefraud “Crash Course” from our website,, and it is being shipped out
haste post haste.
factor is now in the picture, to be covered in an upcoming e-wire. The research
of Dan Gutenkauf of Arizona is now providing the legal basis for candidates and
citizens to demand transparent vote counts, and prevent kind of “under the
rock” tabulations that have saved Gephardt in recent elections.
is the intentions of the Citizens for a Fair Vote Count team – now extending
from sea to shining sea -- to make sure that Mr. Tom Federer, attorney and
brother of Congressional candidate Bill Federer, get together with Dan Gutenkauf
and his research.
Mr. Bill Federer will start to demand, based on the law, that the St. Louis
Board of Elections conduct an honest, transparent vote count, this writer feels
certain that Mr. Gephardt will be GONE on November 7, 2000. OR, at the very
least, millions will MORE than suspect that our “leaders” are being
“chosen” by COMPUTERIZED VOTE FRAUD, NOT BY THE PEOPLE.
pray that the Federers will make this an issue for the last two months of the
campaign in St. Louis. It could be a breakthrough for America in more ways than
Federer for Congress website is federer.org -- please write or email them
encouraging them to make this an issue. It’s his only chance to win. On the
website we find the following contact information: Federer for Congress, PO Box
4373, St. Louis, Missouri 63123, voice: 314-984-0044; fax: 314-984-0079. You can
email the campaign at help at federer.org (remember, we have to trick the topica
system and replace @ with at so the address will be clear to you, the reader)
is NEVER sour grapes for a candidate to demand an honest count BEFORE the
election. The Federer campaign will find this issue to be an empowering issue
that will galvanize its supporters to a new level of enthusiasm.
the Federer campaign owes it to its candidate, to its supporters, and to every
voter in the district to be sure that all the hard work done, all the money
raised, all the hours of time donated --- are not nullified by a few seconds of
effortless manipulation on the part of the writers of the computer program which
will secretly instruct the St. Louis computers what to do on the upcoming
ladies and gentleman, I’m going to be a little sarcastic here. We’re going
to use our beloved catechism format of Q & A.
Can we PROVE that the computers in St. Louis were fixed in 1994, 1996, and 1998
to make Gephardt, Gambling, and Gephardt the “”winners”” after the
electricity and computers went down?
No, we cannot prove that, and neither can anybody else except the nameless,
faceless people that had access to the computer program that was instructing the
computers what to do in St. Louis on those election nights.
Does that mean we must remain silent about such suspicious goings on during
No, it does not. In fact, we deserve the name of moron if we remain silent about
such goings on. REMEMBER, it is NOT the job of us, the citizens, to prove that
the computers are fixed, it the job of the Board of Elections to prove that the
vote is being counted honestly and accurately with citizen checks and balances,
and in a way that makes the process always TRANSPARENT to the voters.
Is the system in use in St. Louis transparent to the voters?
Of course not. And neither is any other computer system, machine system,
internet system, or mail in system. The candidates and voters are making an
“act of blind faith” if the believe the published computer count.
What should be done to election officials who use and enforce a non-transparent
Those election officials, if they try to persist in conducting unverifiable,
non-transparent elections once the proper laws are passed, should be given a
fair trial and convicted, and should lose their citizenship and spend at least
10 years in jail. And some people I know would say that they should be hung for
manipulation is seriously stuff. Foisting traitors and accomplices to high
crimes and misdemeanors -- like Dick Gephardt -- back on the American people --
by means of computer breakdown – must be punished to the fullest extent
allowable by law.
How bad is the system in use in St. Louis?
As bad as it gets. It comparable to the system in use in Cincinnati and
hundreds, maybe thousands, of other venues. It’s a system not transparent to
the public. It’s a system that is unverifiable. It’s a system that is
totally devoid of citizen checks and balances on election day. Any Board of
Elections director who wants to use such a system is a crook or is working for a
We could go on and on, but many of the points we would make are covered in
e-wires already in the archives at votefraud.org –
you know how the Dick Gephardts, the Barbara Boxers, and the Arlen Spectors get
elected over and over again.
Jim Condit Jr.
Director, Citizens for a Fair Vote Count
Citizens for a Fair Vote Count - Go to: http://www.votefraud.org
Network America - go to http://www.networkamerica.org
Read "Best of" Archives on this site or at http://www.lewisnews.com at "Citizens for a Fair Vote Count" section accessed in left hand column of home page.
To Subscribe to our daily Network America e-wire: firstname.lastname@example.org
To Unsubscribe to our daily Network America e-wire: email@example.com
RADIO SHOW ON LINE ALL THE TIME. Listen anytime to the 'Votefraud vs Honest Elections' crash course radio show over the internet at www.sightings.com in the archives, April 3rd, 2000 show, Jeff Rense host, Jim Condit Jr. guest. If the transmission breaks, reconnect to sightings.com and manually move the bar to the place in the show where the audio transmission broke
To write us with information or order by educational tapes and materials by mail, write us at Citizens for a Fair Vote Count, PO Box 11339, Cincinnati, Ohio 45211
To contact us, e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com
Please forward our messages to friends and opinion molders, and tell them about our websites and daily e-wire communications. This information, especially in election season, offers an opportunity to de-stablize the New World Order Ruling Elite and restore honest elections with citizens checks and balances, true Freedom under God, and true Free Enterprise in America.
Let fellow citizens, opinion molders, pastors, public officials, internet news outlets, and major news media outlets know -- that we will not believe the published results of elections until transparent, verifiable, honest vote counting methods are restored, i.e., paper ballots with citizen checks and balances, with the ballot counting under the control of the neighborhood registered voters in each precinct.
Receive free e-mail announcements on vital Election 2000, VoteFraud News and Big TV Manipulation of the American Mind. Enter your e-mail address below, then click "Join"!